| Line 12 was replaced by line 12 |
| - This is implemented with the Q3 variable. It only difference to the QH |
| + This is implemented with the Q3 variable. The only difference to the QH |
| Line 14 was replaced by line 14 |
| - a drive on QH gives an error when a vecotr outside the scatterin plane |
| + a drive on QH gives an error when a vector outside the scattering plane |
| At line 21 added 3 lines. |
| + "Henrik:" |
| + One solution to redundancy problem would be to choose solution that has minimum total tilt - sqrt(Gu^2+Gl^2) would do. |
| + |
| Line 56 was replaced by line 59 |
| - But if something is found anything in the syntax, which might give |
| + But if something is found in the syntax, which might give |
| At line 58 added 25 lines. |
| + |
| + ''Bertrand Roessli:'' |
| + thanks Christoph to have sent me the link. |
| + The following is just the result of some suggestions |
| + that I can think of after discussion with Christof and Markus. |
| + Sorry if they are redudant. |
| + |
| + -It is written that En is set to zero in case |
| + the command 'Sc Qh h k l' does not contain the energy transfer. I think |
| + this is quite dangerous if somebody forgets to do it and the instrument |
| + drives back automatically to the elastic position. |
| + |
| + -It seems there will be no switches in future apparently. Please remember that |
| + TASP has polarisation analysis. |
| + |
| + -The option with the UB matrix allows scans out of the scattering plane. |
| + Some security should be installed to prevent that a typo in a scan or in |
| + a job drives the goniometers (and the cryostat that is on it). I am not sure |
| + that setting the soft limits is a good option. I like Markus' proposition with |
| + the 'sc/dr Q3' command very much. |
| + |
| + |
| + |
| + |
| + |
LIN